A Facebook friend posted today about a local game warden who died in the line of duty--car accident. I sometimes struggle with the description "in the line of duty". All death is tragic, especially car accidents because there is no time to prepare. A loved one is suddenly gone. In the line of duty certainly applies to soldiers killed in war, and first responders killed on the job, but is the death of one of those individuals in a car accident going to or from work any different from other people heading to their jobs? When Trooper Mike Haynes died in a head on collision caused by the drunk driver he was pursuing, it was in the line of duty. The officer crushed by the car of the stranded motorist he was helping, died in the line of duty. Those committed to our safety and protection deserve special honor, but that doesn't necessarily merit the words in the line of duty.
What about the young teacher killed by a drunk driver on her way to the school? Or the mom bringing her kids to school who was permanently disabled when an oncoming car knocked a deer through her windshield? She was also a teacher there. What about the tow truck driver recently struck by a car on the side of the highway? He was on duty at the time. Truck drivers killed in crashes? Loggers struck by trees? There are many kinds of duties beyond those of first responders and many kinds of people have tragic accidents. If killed in the line of duty means everything, including car accidents that can happen to anyone at any time, then it really doesn't mean anything. And the words become a token, not a tribute.